ITwrxOrg
/
SimpleSiteManager
generated from ITwrxOrg/EZ-Bkup
1
0
Code Issues 1 Packages Projects Wiki

CSRF protection for unauth'd users is not really multi-user #5

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-03-30 16:43:45 -05:00 by ITwrx · 0 comments
ITwrx commented 2025-03-30 16:43:45 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

It currently uses the "luck o' the draw" method. :) This is currently used for login for SSM and the contact form handling code in the dynamic/API app. If you have two users fighting to login at the same time, or two visitors fighting to use the contact form, it might make them refresh the page, or try again. Eventually, this might need to be improved, but it is low priority for now.

It currently uses the "luck o' the draw" method. :) This is currently used for login for SSM and the contact form handling code in the dynamic/API app. If you have two users fighting to login at the same time, or two visitors fighting to use the contact form, it might make them refresh the page, or try again. Eventually, this might need to be improved, but it is low priority for now.
ITwrx added the
design flaw
 label 2025-03-30 16:43:45 -05:00
ITwrx added the
low priority
 label 2025-03-30 16:46:18 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
?/support

Question/Support Request

  
accepted

accepted and being worked on.

  
bug/defect

not working as designed

  
design flaw

working as designed, but design is flawed...

  
design note

planning/discussion of how something should work

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature/capability

  
fix in dev

This issue is fixed in a development branch but not included in a release yet.

  
help wanted

Contributions appreciated!

  
invalid

Not actionable as submitted.

  
needs info

The issue requires more information for further action.

  
rejected

Issue not accepted for implementation.

  
feedback?

Let us know what you think!

  
investigating

Under initial investigation for validity and cause.

  
low priority

Could be improved but not the end of the world and it might be a while before it's important enough to address.

  
upstream

issue exists in a project that is upstream of EZ Bkup.

No Label
?/support
accepted
bug/defect
design flaw
design note
duplicate
enhancement
fix in dev
help wanted
invalid
needs info
rejected
feedback?
investigating
low priority
upstream
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: ITwrxOrg/SimpleSiteManager#5
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?