ITwrxOrg
/
SimpleSiteManager
generated from ITwrxOrg/EZ-Bkup
1
0
Code Issues 1 Packages Projects Wiki

Improve CSRF Token implementation for multiuser #2

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-03-29 18:39:09 -05:00 by ITwrx · 1 comment
ITwrx commented 2025-03-29 18:39:09 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Works fine for single user. Not so much for multi-user. Needs investigation.

Works fine for single user. Not so much for multi-user. Needs investigation.
ITwrx added the
accepted
design flaw
 labels 2025-03-29 18:39:09 -05:00
ITwrx commented 2025-03-30 16:37:35 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

This has been reworked for authenticated users. The login form (unauth'd users) uses a more basic mechanism, which might not work properly if two users are trying to login at the same time. May open a separate low priority issue for tracking improvements to that, but closing this, as this was the important use case.

This has been reworked for authenticated users. The login form (unauth'd users) uses a more basic mechanism, which might not work properly if two users are trying to login at the same time. May open a separate low priority issue for tracking improvements to that, but closing this, as this was the important use case.
ITwrx closed this issue 2025-03-30 16:37:35 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
?/support

Question/Support Request

  
accepted

accepted and being worked on.

  
bug/defect

not working as designed

  
design flaw

working as designed, but design is flawed...

  
design note

planning/discussion of how something should work

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature/capability

  
fix in dev

This issue is fixed in a development branch but not included in a release yet.

  
help wanted

Contributions appreciated!

  
invalid

Not actionable as submitted.

  
needs info

The issue requires more information for further action.

  
rejected

Issue not accepted for implementation.

  
feedback?

Let us know what you think!

  
investigating

Under initial investigation for validity and cause.

  
low priority

Could be improved but not the end of the world and it might be a while before it's important enough to address.

  
upstream

issue exists in a project that is upstream of EZ Bkup.

No Label
?/support
accepted
bug/defect
design flaw
design note
duplicate
enhancement
fix in dev
help wanted
invalid
needs info
rejected
feedback?
investigating
low priority
upstream
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: ITwrxOrg/SimpleSiteManager#2
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?