ITwrxOrg
/
Forget-Me-Not
generated from ITwrxOrg/EZ-Bkup
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

monthly on nth weekday is not setting new sendDate #10

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-05-17 11:32:02 -05:00 by ITwrx · 2 comments
ITwrx commented 2025-05-17 11:32:02 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

(aka monthly on week # and weekday)

not able to set new sendDate for some reason and therefore resends notification every 15 min.

(aka monthly on week # and weekday) not able to set new sendDate for some reason and therefore resends notification every 15 min.
ITwrx added the
bug/defect
 label 2025-05-17 11:32:02 -05:00
ITwrx changed title from monthly on nth weekday/month on week# and weekday is not setting new sendDate to monthly on nth weekday is not setting new sendDate 2025-05-17 11:33:14 -05:00
ITwrx added
investigating
 and removed
bug/defect
 labels 2025-05-17 13:47:40 -05:00
ITwrx commented 2025-05-17 13:52:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

not able to reproduce so far in local dev, even when building with --d:release. Investigating.

not able to reproduce so far in local dev, even when building with `--d:release`. Investigating.
ITwrx commented 2025-05-17 14:06:49 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

This only occurs if the send_date and the next send_date are the same due to choosing the 3rd saturday of the month, when today is the 3rd saturday of the month, for instance. It checks the current month for the 3rd sat of the month, and will choose that as the next send_date if it hasn't occured yet, but doesn't exclude the same day, i guess.

This only occurs if the send_date and the next send_date are the same due to choosing the 3rd saturday of the month, when today is the 3rd saturday of the month, for instance. It checks the current month for the 3rd sat of the month, and will choose that as the next send_date if it hasn't occured yet, but doesn't exclude the same day, i guess.
ITwrx added the
fix in dev
 label 2025-05-17 17:02:20 -05:00
ITwrx closed this issue 2025-05-18 10:56:00 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
contrib-dev
release-0.9.0
0.9.0
Labels
Clear labels   
?/support

Question/Support Request

  
accepted

accepted and being worked on.

  
bug/defect

not working as designed

  
design flaw

working as designed, but design is flawed...

  
design note

planning/discussion of how something should work

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature/capability

  
fix in dev

This issue is fixed in a development branch but not included in a release yet.

  
help wanted

Contributions appreciated!

  
invalid

Not actionable as submitted.

  
needs info

The issue requires more information for further action.

  
rejected

Issue not accepted for implementation.

  
feedback?

Let us know what you think!

  
investigating

Under initial investigation for validity and cause.

  
low priority

Could be improved but not the end of the world and it might be a while before it's important enough to address.

  
upstream

issue exists in a project that is upstream of EZ Bkup.

No Label
?/support
accepted
bug/defect
design flaw
design note
duplicate
enhancement
fix in dev
help wanted
invalid
needs info
rejected
feedback?
investigating
low priority
upstream
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: ITwrxOrg/Forget-Me-Not#10
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?